No to both. The strategy is concealed by the zero-knowledge proof — MIZAN verifies it without seeing it. There are two ways to prove, both yielding identical credentials: run the prover on your own hardware (MIZAN sees nothing, trust assumption: none), or — architecture built, live deployment pending — on MIZAN's sealed confidential-GPU enclave, where the witness travels end-to-end encrypted (HPKE) and a hardware attestation proves even MIZAN couldn't see it. Not "trust us not to peek" — proof that peeking was impossible. The attestation core is shipped and tested in the open codebase. And allocation is non-custodial: capital stays in the manager's or allocator's own brokerage account or on-chain vault. MIZAN is the verification standard, never the counterparty.
Every number above is on the record: every credential · verify one yourself · the vocabulary · all questions.